Skip to content


Two New York EMS workers on restricted duty after witnesses claim they wouldn’t help dying pregnant woman at coffee shop near FDNY HQ. Crew may have been on break.

29 comments
Eutisha Revee Rennix via The New York Post.

Eutisha Revee Rennix via The New York Post.

An interesting story out of Brooklyn in what the New York Post is calling an “exclusive”. The incident happened on the morning of December 9 at the Au Bon Pain located at 1 Metrotech Center, in the shadow of FDNY Headquarters at 9 Metrotech Center.

According to the story, the two EMS workers were buying breakfast when the coffee shop workers say they approached the crew telling them that their colleague, 25-year-old Eutisha Revee Rennix, was having shortness of breath and intense stomach pains.

Here are excerpts from the article by Ginger Adams Otis:

“The EMTs just said we had to call 911. They got their bagels and left,” said a disgusted worker.

“People were calling out saying, ‘She’s turning blue! She’s pregnant!’ ” said the witness.

But the EMTs appeared unfazed.

“I remember them saying they couldn’t do anything because they were on their break,” another worker said. “We started screaming and cursing at them.”

That sent a manager rushing to the front to again ask someone in the Metrotech coffee shop to help.

This time, two good Samaritans in blue FDNY sweaters ran to the back office. One called 911 from his cellphone while the other tried to help keep Rennix still.

“That was when the manager ran out to try and get help from across the plaza,” said a worker who was there. “Then the ambulance finally came, but it was too late.”

The Fire Department, which runs the city’s Emergency Medical Service, is now investigating the incident, and has placed the two EMTs on paid but restricted duty, barred from providing patient care.

“All of our members take an oath to assist others in need of emergency medical aid. They have a duty to act when called,” said FDNY spokesman Steve Ritea.

Ironically, the EMS emergency dispatch center that fields 911 calls is located in the same building as Au Bon Pain — just floors above where Rennix collapsed.

And the FDNY headquarters is about 600 feet away within the same Metrotech complex. In fact, the coffee shop is regularly filled with FDNY and EMS personnel and top brass.

The first ambulance on the scene was a private hospital crew that arrived 11 minutes after the initial 911 call.

But that crew’s actions are also being investigated, the FDNY confirmed. Witnesses said the EMTs didn’t have one of the equipment bags needed to administer aid.

“I couldn’t believe it,” said an eyewitness. “The whole thing was like a bad joke.”

Rennix, a mother of a 3-year-old son, Jahleel, was rushed to Long Island College Hospital a mile away in cardiac arrest at approximately 9:48 a.m. She was pronounced dead at 10:17, police records show.

EMS-union head Pat Bahnken said the allegations against the EMTs are being taken seriously.

“Such an isolated incident in no way reflects the professionalism our members exhibit every day. But, if a full investigation shows the allegations to be true, we expect these people to be punished to the fullest extent,” he said.

Also on STATter911 …

Comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

29 Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    What possible validation could these individuals come up with to have NOT helped this woman?? No equipment–poor excuse, because we are trained to “first respond” at the least! Also, why did it take the 1st ambulance 11 minutes to arrive if they are located so close to this scene?? There are many discrepencies to this story that need to be deeply, throughly investigated! Also I feel these individuals need to be suspended WITHOUT pay pending the investigation! Then maybe next time they will take a harder look at who they are denying care to! They are a disgrace to EMS!!!!

    on December 20, 2009 @ 10:39 am. Reply
  2. Mike says

    Although the FDNY HQ is in the same plaza, it is only offices no emergency apparatus. the ambo cam from another location.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 12:05 pm. Reply
  3. A.D says

    Annon – I mostly agree with you but as for the response time for the EMS Unit, they never said where it was coming from. They were close to the FDNY HQ, that doesn’t mean there are trucks stationed there. Both the EMS Agency and Fire Dept I work for have their HQ seprate from any stations and don’t keep EMS units there. So lets not jump the gun.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 12:09 pm. Reply
  4. Ralph says

    There are far too many “unknowns” here. AD, for sure. There`s something missing here. If in fact the crew just “blew off” the person`s request for help without doing anything themselves, shame on them. Lettum fry for all I care. But I don`t know one co-worker that wouldn`t react to such a request for help. Yes, we`d still advise them to call 911. But we wouldn`t grab our bagel and leave. Something`s fishy here.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 1:16 pm. Reply
  5. Anonymous says

    Ralph,

    I have to agree with you. It doesn’t make a lot of sense and it seems like some crucial information is missing.

    I will be on the the lookout for the rest of this story.

    Statter

    on December 20, 2009 @ 1:29 pm. Reply
  6. Anonymous says

    Could it be a union break ? Doesn’t make sense, but I think the others are right that information is missing….

    on December 20, 2009 @ 2:03 pm. Reply
  7. NREMT-P, says

    There is only so much that can be done if you are on break with no equipment. And it sounds like if the store would have called 911 from a land line (in stead of a bystander calling from a cell phone) then an ambulance may have been started earlier. Also I think a look at labor laws and union laws needs to be looked at, it may be against the EMTs union contract to work on break. An honestly they are in New York City, I am sure if they did not say no from time to time on break they would be working non-stop (thats probably why they have scheduled breaks, and most of the rest of the ems world does not). So I for one support the EMT’s until proven otherwise. They are innocent until proven guilty, so put away you gallows!

    on December 20, 2009 @ 2:19 pm. Reply
  8. annon says

    ralph,
    where do you work? And what percentage of you shift are you on calls? My bet is less than 80% of the time so a break is not really a break, and you probably dont go out of service for it.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 2:21 pm. Reply
  9. Bekah says

    Even if you are not on duty at all why would you not respond to a woman in trouble? If you are at the scene you can at least sit there with her until help arrives. It doesn’t make sense. If you are having lunch on your day off and someone starts choking would you just sit there and watch them die and tell them they can’t have your help because you are not being paid? Tell them they have to wait for the ambulance because you don’t have oxygen on hand or an et kit on hand or whatever on hand?? Then watch them turn hypoxic and die because the ambulance was 10 minutes out so they were without air for 10 minutes?? These two EMT’s didn’t even just sit there and watch they Walked Away and left this woman for dead!!! I don’t give a rat’s …. about union breaks; we have a moral obligation to help someone who is dying …. we aren’t working retail services where we can sit there and say Im sorry I can’t help you find this item because I am on break.
    Now I will give the EMT’s this much …. They might not have been able to save her life. They were negligent except for the fact they were not the DIRECT cause of her death. Her heart was, and for that these EMT’s may not be dealt with as harshly as we’d like them to be. But maybe, just maybe, they might have been able to save her or if not her, at least keep her alive enough to save the baby possibly (depending of course on the gestational age) and for that they need to be held responsible.
    This story just should never have happened. Eutisha’s family is in our thoughts and prayers.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 7:58 pm. Reply
  10. Texas Retired says

    Hey NREMT-P,
    can you say EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN, much less human compassion? Labor laws and uniun laws SHOULD’NT have squat to do with saving a life. In my 30 yrs of proud service, I have never known a fire or medical emergency to wait until I was “available”. If you feel that way, maybe you should be in another line of work.

    I will agree that there is still to much missing from this story.If the emt’s were truely emt’s WTF

    on December 20, 2009 @ 9:05 pm. Reply
  11. Texas Gordo says

    I’m a big supporter of innocent until guilty, but there were certainly steps this crew should have been willing to take, it doesn’t appear they were diverting from a call as they left with their bagels with a half shmear, and is there a union rep who wouldn’t rather have to speak to the papers about his members always being on-duty for the citizens of NYC.

    My family and I spend a few weeks in the Finger Lakes every summer. On more than one occasion I’ve been the first responder on scene, often with my children in the car, and I’ve worked the call until the arrival of the Fire/EMS crews that are certified/licensed to provide care in that district. Often my only gear was a juice box and a towel, but that didn’t stop me from managing the ABC’s, controlling major bleeding, preventing further trauma to the C-spine, or from giving dispatch and the paid crews with the most accurate assessment of the scene that I could.

    As for why it took 11 minutes for the dispatched crew to respond, have you ever been to NYC. I’d rather drive through downtown Fallujah, and even if you could get to the scene in under two hours, it is like having every call at the top of a mountain, everything is vertical.

    Here in Texas when you screw up and have your certification of license suspended or yanked the State posts that information for the public record.

    If we were to clear out the bottom 10% of the deadwood in the Fire and EMS side we would be a step closer to being a sigma six service.

    on December 20, 2009 @ 10:06 pm. Reply
  12. Artie says

    Retired EMT-P
    Since when do you tell a patient in a emergency that you are on break, I was off the day the world trade got hit, but guess where I went in my own car?? Oh, I guess I should have stayed home, I was OFF. Give it a break either you are a EMERGENCY responder or NOT>>>>>>>

    on December 20, 2009 @ 11:36 pm. Reply
  13. Anonymous says

    NREMTP,
    It is against the FLSA to charge a FF/EMT for taking a lunch/dinner break because they are still technically responsible for providing a service during that time period. I don’t buy your theory on break time. Second, These two could have initiated patient assessment without their “equipment”. I would assume they could scrounge a watch, pen, and sheet of paper for history and meds. I’m just a dumb EMT and I could of handled that.Finally, If they were in uniform they were representing the FD.
    I sincerely hope that something is missing from this story. I’m not ready to convict these two yet….but it doesn’t look good.

    on December 21, 2009 @ 4:36 am. Reply
  14. WFDT says

    I’m willing to bet that the truth to this situation lies somewhere in the middle.

    on December 21, 2009 @ 9:24 am. Reply
  15. DC Firefighter says

    Why wait for the truth, when most of the people on here are willing to pass judgement on this case without having all of the facts, knowing all of the laws/rules that apply in that jurisdiction, and not one of them having been there. I hope you guys are never on a jury that I am relying on, ‘jury of my peers” yeah right, these comment sections to these stories become instant bashing grounds for those who think they are perfect, and for them to pass judgement on those who they feel are not perfect.

    Everyone who signs on for this job is motivated by a different set of values and reasons, yet everyone at some point understands that compassion and a desire to help those in our community drives us to do our jobs. Yet it astounds me that people get on here and get on their high horse and tell everyone else how bad they are at their job and how perfect they are in their own little worlds.

    I will reserve passing judgement on these individuals until the department they work finishes their investigation, all the facts come out, and a decision is rendered. No matter what everyone deserves that, except of course those perfect omniscient individuals on here who don’t feel that reserving judgement on these people is the right thing to do.

    Good Luck being perfect, I hear that as time goes on that becomes harder and harder to be…

    on December 21, 2009 @ 11:25 am. Reply
  16. JERRY says

    I SAY LETS HERE THE EMTS SIDE OF IT

    on December 21, 2009 @ 11:29 am. Reply
  17. Texas Gordo says

    DC Firefighter,

    You have some valid points, but I disagree that one should be unable to comment without a full report. I was confident when alerted, that the first tower had been hit on 9-11, that it was a terrorist attack, and I thought it most likely would be perpetrated by Islamic terrorists. I didn’t know that the majority would be from Saudi Arabia, but I did bat 50% in the opening minutes.

    If the Post hadn’t reported the story than it is unlikely that Mayor Bloomberg would have felt the need to comment on the case. If this had been a pretty blond 18 year old girl who was a tourist from South Carolina that died in NYC, then I feel confident that it FOX would have devoted their entire line-up to reporting on it. The court of public opinion does cause grease the wheels of justice to move faster than they might otherwise, and that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

    I hate moments like the Duke lax case, but this seems much more like Roger Clemens than it was those boys.

    on December 21, 2009 @ 6:39 pm. Reply
  18. DC Firefighter says

    Texas Gordo,

    I could care less whether you think I make valid points or not. Your most recent post is full of broad, sweeping generalizations that have nothing to do with the current case. 9/11, pretty blond 18 year old girl, Duke Lax case, Roger CLemens? What are you talking about or referring to? You also dance around bringing up the issue of race as an underlying issue in this case. I don’t feel that that point has even been raised yet, but way to go, just throw that card out there and get the waters even more muddied than they already are on what may or may not have have happened by clouding it up with the race issue.

    Your not Bloomberg, your not FOX News, you are one person posting their opinion (which you are entitled to) on a blog site. Just think about what it would be like if it was you on the other end of a situation that gets posted on here. And you are the subject of comments by your so called “peers” on here who log on, post a comment and tear you apart, because they think they know something about the situation you happen to be in the middle of.

    Any city official who passes judgement on one of its employees before that person is entitled to the due process of their rules and regs is WRONG. Any news organization that runs stories that are biased and one sided, or serves some other purpose is wrong as well. Believe me up here in DC we have more than our share of situations that make for some bad press. Sometimes the guys involved screwed up, and sometimes they didn’t. But no matter what we always get raked over the coals, by our “peers”, our city leadership, and the press. That may be the way it is, but just because something is that way it is doesn’t make it right…

    on December 21, 2009 @ 9:13 pm. Reply
  19. intelmedic says

    Everyone need to stop for a second. As a long time NYC Paramedic, this is relatively simple to go through. FIRST, let’s preface this by saying IF the eyewitness accounts are true, then yes, this situation is absolutely horrific and needs to be dealt with to the fullest extent of the law. NOW, let’s assume that perhaps there is something missing here. If that is the case, then it is simply put that any information outstanding will come out and if this did not go down the way it has been alleged; then the crews need to return to work in their regular capacity. Public servants are constantly under scrutiny and if the crew is not guilty of any infractions, then they just need to wait until their internal affairs division, also called BITS (Bureau of Investigations and Trials), finishes their inquiries.

    Having worked in the NYC city system for more than twenty years, it is sad to say that there are those who come into the system and see the job as a paycheck, a means to something else; and unfortunately, DO STUPID, IMMORAL THINGS. The way the system works is this. Crews are given the “privlige” of a meal break; BUT as always in emergency services; if an emergency drops that they are needed for; the “privlige” of that meal break is suspended. MOST CERTAINLY, if in the course of your break, you witness or are flagged down for an emergency, you are EXPECTED to initiate patient care and that patient is now theirs. This is not a situation where you call for another EMS unit to take the patient. You are a uniformed EMS worker and you have a moral, ethical, professional and operational duty to assume care for the patient. AT NO TIME are you to ABANDON a patient situation. With the numerous witnesses allegedly calling to them, they had the DUTY TO ACT and investigate the issue. From the news reports, this pregnant female went into seizures. For those of you unfamiliar, this COULD BE a common condition with high-risk pregnancies(if this was one) called eclampsia or toxemia. Patients for a variety of reasons will seize during the pregnancy and in fact there is a direct and specific FDNY Paramedic Protocol to treat this, with medications that the Advanced Life Support crews carry, and when administered; can have very effective results. Even if they were just a BLS unit, they should have initiated care and called for ALS back up. IF and let me repeat this, IF this situation occurred as it has been alleged; then this goes far beyond a civil suit, and I hope that Brooklyn D.A. Charles Hynes and his staff seek criminal prosecution. IF there is a missing link in this; then I think I speak for us all when I say we hope that there is something valid and it didn’t go down this way. With numerous accounts, it doesn’t look good. In addition and another very typical incident involving MANY crews in the city and in other EMS venues; it is reported that the crew that responded allegedly failed to bring in all of their equipment.

    Let me say on this topic, there is a specific operational procedure that states that the proper equipment be brought to the patient, not left in the ambulance. In these instances, crews do prejudge the call before making patient contact or are just plain lazy. It should not happen; EVER. Just like this crew allegedly walking away. It is beyond comprehension if the first crew just walked way, but not improbable. Some people just don’t care; whether they are lazy, sometimes it could be demographics; who knows. We DO need to let all the factors come out into the open. At the same time, let’s be mindful that numerous witnesses corroborate the story thus far.

    Their actions are just as stupid as someone running up to a fire engine or ladder company at the supermarket getting food to cook and telling them that there is a fire; and the crew looking at that person and telling them to call 911. There is NOT nor has there ever been one regulation authorizing the abandonment of patient care because of a food break on break; so in that regard, if this is true; the crew should be hammered. If this is the case, the actions are a direct violation to every concept that we rescuers exist.

    To those who are having a cow about “judgement”; keep in mind that we live in a very selfish world. Look at the Bernie Madoff’s and anyone else these days who prey on people’s misfortune. These types do exist in every profession; even in EMS. I have personally taken care of patient’s where crews left them laying there, thinking they would not be caught. It takes a specific kind of schmuck to abandon someone in need; let’s hope that these two crew members are not of that stock. Let’s watch and see how it pans out.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 2:25 am. Reply
  20. DC Firefighter says

    Screw it would appear from the numerous posts on this blog that I am completely in the minority when it comes to judgment and waiting for the facts to emerge regarding this incident. From now on I will take everything that I read in the press regarding a public incident as gospel, unquestionable, unimpeachable, full and unadulterated truth. I will then pass complete, biased, and severe pre-judgment upon those who are accused of infractions with my patronizing, self-deprecating, holier than thou opinion of their actions and the subsequently deserved punishment. Because apparently I am without fault, and therefore can judge others with impunity, and after all the investigative due process and trial board that those individuals “should” be entitled to really is a moot point right? We should call their department and tell Bloomberg and the others that they don’t have to waste any time with a long and tedious investigative process or trial hearing, thus delaying public satisfaction to have these individuals heads delivered on a silver platter.

    I think that I am done having a “cow” about passing judgment now.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 8:29 am. Reply
  21. oscar williams says

    Anybody who defends the two emts are a freakin idoit and I do mean Idiot. Look if u were gettin robbed in broad daylight by a mugger and a uniform police officer just watches you get robbed then goes and finishes his doghnut down the block , then you would be screaming bloody murder. So dont be a Idiot think before you speak and not vice a versa. I would think after 9/11 and the way people actually lost their lives trying to help absolute strangers would kinda set some type of standerd to live by in this city,if not the country .

    on December 22, 2009 @ 10:30 am. Reply
  22. Texas Gordo says

    DC Firefighter,

    If you need a home for that new born calf, we have room here in Texas.

    Race, gender, beauty, wealth, fame, youth, and brutality of the incident being reported on, are all factors that peak the interest of readers of print and viewers of video. This woman’s case seems to be an issue of injustice, and it involves an unborn child.

    My point about 9-11 was that even without the Commission’s report, I was still confident that I understood the intent behind the incident in those first few minutes. One does not always need to wait for a complete report to have some basic idea of what took place. We agree that it is wrong to confuse that with a 360 and additional data points coming in.

    Natalee Holloway went missing in Aruba, and it was national news for weeks on FOX. All of the missing and murdered people in the world, and they happened to go with the whitest and most photogenic one.

    The Duke Lax program was destroyed, reputations gutted, and a coach fired, because an overzealous DA wanted to win an election. This was a prime example of the media, and the nation getting it wrong because they didn’t wait for the facts.

    Roger Clemens is a prime example of the nation and media getting it correct on the first try.

    At times I try and hold my tongue, and at others, it slips out, and I trip all over it. Your initial statement had validity, and I would hate to be on a news site having my reputation sullied, and I’m glad that I grew up in an era when video and computers were in their nascent stage.

    The media is only as biased as the readers and viewers demand it to be. My guess is that most reporters would prefer to report on stories that are less of the “if it bleeds it leads” variety, but we as consumers have made that choice for them. Queen for a Day was there at the start of TV, and now we have “reality tv” on most major networks.

    If you don’t like your officials in DC than vote them out, write letters to the editor, or even visit a city council meeting and speak-up. Nothing is stopping you from campaigning for an official that will promote the causes you believe in. I really do wish you luck on that front. The elected officials work for us, not the other way around.

    And DC Firefighter, I hope we agree on this one, get rid of the bottom 10% in Fire and EMS. Have the unions stop protecting them. They are dangerous, they hurt and kill people, including us. They cause the public to perceive us in a bad light. If we were rid of them, the occasional fault by a well trained professional would be seen for what it was, an accident.

    A joyous holiday season to you and your family, and I’ll be looking for a manger scene with an extra calf.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 10:51 am. Reply
  23. DC Firefighter says

    I guess that in my calls for prudence and patience for the facts of the case to emerge people have taken that I am in some way defending the alleged actions of these individuals. I assure you I am not, nor do I condone anyone who would engage in this type of behavior and bring a bad light upon their department or the fire service in general. If in fact they did what they are being accused of then they should be subject to the full extent of the punishment afforded by their department and the law. I am simply awe struck by the overzealous ignorance that many exhibit in their responses by assuming that if your are accused of something then sure as S*@T you must be guilty of it. Simply by illustrating that sometimes the news gets it right and sometimes they don’t shouldn’t guide how people are presumed guilty until they are proven innocent.

    Your right about the 10%, unfortunately to simply set a different standard for them and the rest of the fire service creates in itself a biased playing field. The 10% usually take care of themselves if your give them enough time and opportunity, what’s the old saying ‘just give ‘em enough rope to do it themselves’.

    As far as the elected officials go, up here in DC nothing is going to change. Recently, our Mayor blasted two police officers and the police department by outright accusing these two men in public after an officer involved shooting with a teenager. There was a public outcry of injustice, so the Mayor then paid for the funeral of the victim out of his own pocket, and then called for an outside investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office to get to the bottom of it. When it was all said and done it turns our it was a justified shoot, and the officers were cleared of any wrongdoing. Was there an apology by the Mayor or other city officials, did the Police Chief who went right along with the Mayor slamming her own two men apologize to her own people, no. Nothing in the form of any sort of apology was made to these two men who were treated as guilty before being proved innocent. It was merely a byline of a news story, which received about 1/100th of the coverage that the two officers being tried by public opinion initially received. Yet until the truth came out these two men were dragged through the mud, and their reputations destroyed in the name of what the press and supposed ‘eye witnesses’ reported. Everyone simply believed what was initially reported, and went along with the story hook, line, and sinker.

    Bottom line if you did wrong and were derelict of duty then the facts of the case will show what you did was wrong, and you will have to stand the line and accept the consequences of your actions. But to be judged, tried, and convicted before the investigation is complete and the truth is brought to light is just as wrong.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 2:56 pm. Reply
  24. michael says

    It has been reported they had no equipment and worked as administrators (dispatch office) when the incident happened. One of the two was the first to call 911 according to reports. They did not leave the scene they awaited a working crews arrival. Knowing CPR the rule taught is if you do not have a mask (AR), do you have a duty to act if you are not a working responding crew. Humanity would say yes, common sense says if you don’t know the person they could have a communicable disease during breaths, despite chest compressions. They assessed but did not resuscitate, do not agree but lets see the whole story. If I were off duty did not carry a portable mask and a stranger needed CPR, not sure what I would do based on risks and liability. On duty, I should carry a mask as a public servant.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 3:55 pm. Reply
  25. Texas Gordo says

    DC-F,

    It was understood that you made a call for a thorough accounting of the facts rather than a lynch mob mentality.

    A tough deal for the two DC-PD, and my knowledge of DC politics stopped after Marion Barry was re-elected to city council. I guess Louisiana had Edwin Edwards, and Texas had Tom DeLay, so no one is devoid of inspiring leadership.

    Do DC Fire and PD live in the District, or are they residents in the neighboring states. It seems to me they would be quite a voting block.

    I look forward to more of your thoughts on other issues.

    on December 22, 2009 @ 9:29 pm. Reply
  26. DC Firefighter says

    TxG,

    No residency rule for any public safety employees. There used to be a mileage restriction of how far away from the city one could live, but that has been lifted. Now there are people who live in PA & NC who work for the department. Our department has turned into a paycheck, lost a lot of tradition and camaraderie that once existed.

    Till next time, stay safe

    on December 23, 2009 @ 1:52 pm. Reply
  27. Intercommunity Medeic says

    I only have a legal obligation to help someone if I am dispatched to that call. Morals and ethics may move someone to help another person. There is only so much I can do without the equipment I am trained to use. The general public think that what they see on television for 30 minutes or one hour is what this job is really like. The fact is very few few outside of EMS know what we can do. Annoymous you are a raging tool. My primary goal is to return home to my family at the end of my shift in the same condition or better than when I started. I am not a hero. People die and there is nothing anyone can do about it. All we can do is preform what our duties we a trained to do when WE ARE DISPATCHED to a call. We don’t know any of the facts. Did this pt have any underlying medical problems prior to this event? Just remember a person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    on December 27, 2009 @ 3:04 am. Reply
  28. JTT says

    Ok, folks, I’m not even IN New York but I already know that these folks were not street EMTs – they were DISPATCHERS that worked right upstairs. One of them made the call based upon what they were told, they never were permitted back to see the patient and apparently weren’t given adequate information. Best I can tell, neither ever worked as street EMTs, had little to no real experience and were EMTs only because FDNY required them to be.

    As for the second crew that responded, I assume they were only told what the first two folks knew, which was minimal.

    on January 1, 2010 @ 10:26 am. Reply
  29. formerfdnyems says

    Hey annon,

    Your post ”
    ralph,
    where do you work? And what percentage of you shift are you on calls? My bet is less than 80% of the time so a break is not really a break, and you probably dont go out of service for it.
    on December 20, 2009 @ 2:21 pm”

    Obviously you have NEVER worked in a busy, urban, EMS system. As, 80% of your time is NOT on break. So, go be a hobbyist somewhere else, you have NO clue what urban EMS guys go through everyday.

    on January 6, 2010 @ 9:45 pm. Reply

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.