Skip to content


DC Fire Chief Kenneth Ellerbe now gets his say. His views on going to 12-hour shifts for firefighters. Plus the chief is getting a lot of heat. Read the comment cards.

33 comments

Read entire opinion by Chief Kenneth Ellerbe

Previous coverage of Chief Ellerbe's plan herehere, here and here

Click here to follow STATter911.com on Facebook (hit "like")

On November 30, DC Fire & EMS Department Chief Kenneth Ellerbe really stirred things up by officially telling DC City Council members he wanted firefighters to move from four platoons of 24/72 to three platoons on 12-hour rotations with three shifts of day work, followed by three shifts of night work, followed by three days off (3-3-3). Since then, there has been a lot written about this subject in the Washington Post.

It started with a Post editorial generally supporting the chief's plan. That was followed by an op ed piece by IAFF Local 36 President Ed Smith who supports the status quo of 24/72 and believes 12-hour shifts would not save the city money and would cause firefighter fatigue. Then Marcus Rosenbaum, the brother of former New York Times reporter David Rosenbaum, had an op ed piece saying both the 24/72 and 3-3-3 shifts were not compatible with having alert firefighters, paramedics and EMTs working the streets of the Nation's Capital. 

This weekend Chief Ellerbe gets his say in the Post. Here are excerpts:

Firefighters would work a 48-hour week, while EMTs and paramedics would continue to work 42 hours. Additionally, EMT and paramedic start times would be adjusted to increase the number of employees on duty to provide “peak load staffing” of ambulances during our busiest times.

The result would be more personnel available during each shift, reducing the need to pay overtime to fully staff fire trucks and ambulances during vacations, illnesses and training. Over several years, the department would be able to reduce staffing through attrition, eventually reaching the optimal number of personnel to meet our service obligations — without closing fire stations or cutting services. We think the savings from this strategy could exceed $30 million annually by fiscal 2017.

There are arguments to made regarding how 24- and 12-hour shifts affect job performance. But working 24 hours straight is too long for employees of the department, given our extremely heavy call load.

My priority as chief remains utilitarian: providing the best possible service at the best possible price.

Some of our employees may consider the changes we are discussing to be a hardship, but this department’s commitment to D.C. residents remains unchanged. I remain hopeful that executive managers and the labor organization can come together to accomplish this.

Chief Ellerbe received a lot of positive reaction from members of the City Council when his plan was first presented. But many firefighters continue to criticize the chief in comments sections of various websites and on Facebook about the shift plan, his banning of outerwear with the DCFD logo and other issues.

One of the most recent criticisms came from the blog, Raising Ladders. Written by a DC firefighter and paramedic, the latest column focuses on comment cards that are to be handed to patients the department comes in contact with. Below is the real card and below that a modified version posted on Raising Ladders. Click here for the commentary that goes with the cards

.

Do you want to sell a vehicle? Click HERE to find out how with SellFireTrucks.com.

Another view on DC shift change controversy. Brother of slain New York Times reporter David Rosenbaum points to studies saying current 24/72 & Chief Ellerbe’s 12-hour shifts both aren’t safe.

54 comments

Read Marcus Rosenbaum's opinion

Previous coverage of Chief Ellerbe's plan here, here and here

Click here to follow STATter911.com on Facebook (hit "like")

Marcus Rosenbaum has written a column for The Washington Post about Chief Kenneth Ellerbe's proposal to do away with the current shift for firefighters of 24/72 and replace it with 12-hour shifts of three days, three nights and three off (3-3-3). Rosenbaum's brother David was a former New York Times reporter who was beaten on a Northwest Washington street six years ago. David Rosenbaum's treatment by the Metropolitan Police Department, the DC Fire & EMS Department and Howard University Hospital was found to be greatly flawed and highlighted problems with the way EMS was delivered in the Nation's Capital.

Following David Rosenbaum's death, his family dropped a lawsuit against the City in exchange for a task force to lead the way to major improvements for EMS. The task force called for "shorter shifts for all employees . . . to ensure the goal of having alert and awake employees who can provide competent patient care.”

Chief Ellerbe has cited the report in justifying both his shift change plan and the recent controversy over the department's logo.

Marcus Rosenbaum, pointing to studies done on performance for those who are sleep deprived, believes that 24-shifts are not safe when it comes to patient care. But Rosenbaum says the studies also show that Chief Ellerbe's plan is not the way to go either. Rosenbaum thinks both sides need to come together and approach this with open minds so they can develop a schedule that does not include extended work hours that can cause sleep deprivation.

Here are some excerpts from this latest opinion piece on the shift change issue:

Sleep deprivation leads to underperformance and serious mistakes. In fact, in 2008 the National Institute of Medicine recommended that doctors-in-training should not work more than 16 hours in a row, should not be awakened to treat patients and should not even drive home if they have worked longer than 16 hours. And a 2009 article on shift work in the journal Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports concludes that firefighters’ performance “is likely to be significantly degraded” on shifts like those used in the District.

Setting aside whether it’s proper for anyone to be paid to sleep during work hours, people who have life-and-death jobs need adequate sleep, whether they are doctors or airline pilots or firefighters or EMTs. That’s impossible in a busy firehouse. “If you’re waking up every two hours,” says Charles Czeisler, director of the Division of Sleep Medicine at Harvard Medical School, “you might as well be up all night.”

Shorter shifts are the only way to ensure that our emergency workers get enough sleep. But this doesn’t mean that Chief Ellerbe’s 3-3-3 plan is the right way to do it. Indeed, Czeisler thinks it’s perfectly horrible. First, he says, no one should work six 12-hour days in a row. Ever. Twelve-hour shifts make people “chronically sleep-deprived”; six in a row is a disaster. (Ellerbe says that built-in, rotating extra days off would rarely require anyone to work six days in a row, but to avoid it they would have to forgo quite a bit of overtime pay.)

Second, Czeisler says, no one should have to work three day shifts followed by three night shifts. Instead, people should work days for an extended period, followed by nights for an extended period. “You don’t want to be jerked around from one shift to another,” he says. If you are, your biological clock can never get set, and your body is always out of sync; you’re working below your ability no matter what shift you’re on.

Do you want to sell a vehicle? Click HERE to find out how withSellFireTrucks.com.

IAFF Local 36 rebuttal to Washington Post: ‘A shift toward sleep deprived firefighters.’

10 comments

Click here to read entire op-ed piece by Ed Smith

Read Defence Research & Development Canada shift study

Previous coverage of Chief Ellerbe's plan here and here

Click here to follow STATter911.com on Facebook (hit "like")

IAFF Local 36 president Ed Smith's rebuttal to a December 26 Washington Post editorial supporting a move away from a 24/72 work schedule has now been posted on the Post's website. Smith disputes the claims of DC Fire & EMS Chief Kenneth Ellerbe that a 3-3-3 schedule of 12-hour shifts will provide improved patient care because firefighters will be better rested and that $36 million dollar in overtime will be saved.

Smith says that shift change overtime expenditures will more than double with two shift changes a day instead of one. He cites an increased call load for the afternoon or evening changeover that will mean more units on calls when the shift change is suppposed to occur.

But Smith focuses most of his attention on the fatigue rotating 12-hour shifts will cause firefighters. He points to a 2005 study of firefighter work schedules from Canada that concludes the current 24/72 arrangement is the best schedule for "sustaining cognitive performance in the face of nocturnal alarms":

Noting that sleep deficits are cumulative, the study determined that working back-to-back night shifts is more exhausting than powering through a single, longer shift with more time to recover. The research concluded that recovery time, rather than shift length, is the most important factor to consider in creating a firefighter work schedule.

imagine yourself working such a schedule: It can take weeks, or even months, to adapt to a full 12-hour change in sleep hours; it is simply impossible to healthily switch from day work to night work and back over the course of a week, every week, as Ellerbe proposes. Such a regimen will inevitably lead to sleep-deprived firefighters who are less able to perform their jobs.

Ellerbe’s budget calculations are also problematic. He has asserted that a 3-3-3 schedule will save the city $36 million a year by reducing overtime and allowing the city to use attrition to thin the ranks of firefighters.

Local 36 of the International Association of Fire Fighters has done its own analysis of Ellerbe’s proposal, and our math shows that the 3-3-3 schedule would actually cost the city between $16 million and $45 million the first year, depending on how it is implemented.

Do you want to sell a rig? Click HERE to find out how withSellFireTrucks.com.

Washington Post supports DC Fire & EMS Department shift change. Editorial board calls it ‘A shift for the better’.

63 comments

Click here to read the entire Washington Post Editorial

Click here to follow STATter911.com on Facebook (hit "like")

Previous coverage of Chief Ellerbe's plan

IAFF Local 36

DC Fire & EMS Department

This evening The Washington Post published an editorial on its web site titled, "A shift for the better: New hours for D.C. firefighters". In it, the Post generally supports DC Fire & EMS Department Chief Kenneth Ellerbe's plan to do away with the 24-hours on, 72-hours off, four platoon shift currently in place.

Besides echoing Chief Ellerbe's money will be saved, the Post editorial board says for the department to be fully unified, as recommended by the task force that looked into the 2006 death of New York Times reporter David Rosenbaum, firefighters should work the same 12-hour shifts as the civilian EMS force.

The editorial also makes the point, with EMS being bulk of the work load for firefighters, the department needs to move away from 24-hour shifts to reduce errors, similar to the trend of  hospitals shortening shifts for interns.

Here are some excerpts from the editorial:

An altered work schedule has the potential to save money while ensuring better emergency services.

Mr. Ellerbe said the change would help curb excessive overtime while enabling (through attrition) a reduction in the number of full-time employees, eventually saving $36 million per year.

Whether the so-called 3-3-3 plan is the best combination is to be determined, but the chief is persuasive on the need to reexamine the 24-hour shift. Shorter shifts would allow for more training opportunities.

Since firefighters, paid annually, would work more hours per week under the new scenario, more compensation is in order, particularly since they have not had a raise since 2006.

More money won’t appease everyone who has built a life around a work schedule that — with its requirement of just eight or nine workdays a month — allows extended time with families, second jobs and the ability to live as far away as North Carolina. Ed Smith, president of the firefighters union, says he believes the change will prompt an exodus from the department, including by EMS-qualified firefighters who were recruited to upgrade the department in the wake of the Rosenbaum case.

Do you want to sell a rig? Click HERE to find out how withSellFireTrucks.com.